Re: [boost] Class-level instrospection

Subject: Re: [boost] Class-level instrospection
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-09 11:17:29

AMDG

Joel Falcou wrote:
> In the same way, checking for suff like operator[] yields invalid 
> class name has_member_function_operator[]. So I propose we hand-code 
> the following :
>
> BOOST_HAS_SUBSCRIPT_OPERATOR( void(int) ) that builds a 
> has_subscript_operator<T> class. Other similar operator should be 
> handled the same way.

Can't you use a more general macro:

BOOST_NAMED_HAS_MEMBER_FUNCTION(has_subscript_operator, operator[], 
void(int))

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe