Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] Boost.Build merge?
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-10 14:01:55


Folks,
I would have like to merge Boost.Build state from trunk to release branch.
This matter was discussed briefly in

        http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/180814/

but it didi not lead anywhere, and further it seems to be some confusion
between merging Boost.Jam (which Rene wants) and merging Boost.Build.

To reiterate, I think Boost.Build should be merged because:

        - it now supports linux->windows cross compile
        - it allows to eliminate configuration warning messages from
        libraries that are not built (which requires corresponding
        merges for libraries Jamfiles, but it's trivial)
        - it fixes a bug where include=/foo/bar could not be specified
        on the command line
        - it has some other smaller fixes
        - I don't see any breakage on trunk tests

Comments?

- Volodya

-- 
Vladimir Prus
http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com
Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk