Subject: Re: [boost] [date_time] Library status?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-13 15:49:24
Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Andrey Semashev
>> The Boost.DateTime library is very useful, and it is unfortunate to
>> admit that according to Trac report and personal experience, its current
>> state is anything but good. There are long standing tickets, some of
>> them are trivial to fix and have patches already attached. The most
>> annoying ones are missing includes and name clashes (tickets 642, 1740,
>> 1615, 2083, 2091 to name some of them). Is this library still maintained?
> I've forwarded the above to Jeff Garland. If he doesn't respond we will
> authorize someone else to apply at least the trivial fixes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk