Re: [boost] Ticket #2115 Avoid bad Apple macros

Subject: Re: [boost] Ticket #2115 Avoid bad Apple macros
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-14 09:37:15

Heh, I forgot about that one. Suppose we just

   #define check BOOST_PREVENT_MACRO_SUBSTITUION check

?  ;-)

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 13, 2008, at 11:51 PM, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]>  
wrote:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> "John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Are the Apple defined macros function-like macros?  If so we could  
>>> use
>>> the usual macro-expansion suppression in these cases as we do with  
>>> min/max.
>> Yeah, just as long as we keep in mind that the parens suppress  
>> ADL.  In
>> other words     check(x)
>> and
>>    (check)(x)
>> are not equivalent.
>
> I think John is referring to the BOOST_PREVENT_MACRO_SUBSTITUTION  
> macro:
>
>  check BOOST_PREVENT_MACRO_SUBSTITUTION (x)
>
> -- 
> Eric Niebler
> BoostPro Computing
> http://www.boostpro.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>