Subject: Re: [boost] [thread_safe_signals][signals2] call for reviewers(review tentatively scheduled Nov 1st - Nov 10th)
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-14 12:45:38
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Gregor" <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [thread_safe_signals][signals2] call for
reviewers(review tentatively scheduled Nov 1st - Nov 10th)
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Stjepan Rajko <stipe_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> The review for the Signals2 library (formerly known as
>> thread_safe_signals - description below) submitted by Frank Mori Hess
>> has been tentatively scheduled for Nov 1st - Nov 10th. As per a
>> recent discussion on the review process (http://tinyurl.com/48tdjs),
>> and after consulting with the review wizards, we would like to try
>> something new for this review: have a number of reviewers commit
>> beforehand to submitting a review.
> I will *definitely* be reviewing this library.
> - Doug
The name of Boost.Signal2 seems as the V2 of Boost.Signal. Is it the case?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk