Subject: Re: [boost] [parameter] Redefining BOOST_PARAMETER_MAX_ARITY
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-14 19:41:26
on Tue Oct 14 2008, Jamie Allsop <ja11sop-AT-yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Also I wonder if there is some theoretical or practical upper limit?
>> Surely there is a practical upper limit, but it depends on your compiler
>> and I don't know what it is.
> gcc 4.2 and as it happens I was using 15 parameters (yes a lot, time
> pressures et al. caused both my hasty post and lack of
> simplification). One thing I did not mention was that this is a very
> cool library.
My co-author and I appreciate the positive feedback :-)
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk