Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] tie alternative?
From: Jonas Persson (l.j.persson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-27 08:58:29


David Abrahams skrev:
> OK, BOOST_FOREACH aside, iterating over a range returned as a pair of
> iterators can be painful and ugly:
>
> vertex_iterator pv, ve;
> tie(pv, ve) = vertices(g); // unpack the pair returned by vertices
> for (; pv != pe; ++pv)
> {
> ...
> }
>
> However, we can make it much nicer, e.g.:
>
> for (vertex_iterator pv,ve = xxx(pv,vertices(g)); pv != ve; ++pv)
> {
> ...
> }
>
> My only problem is how to spell xxx. The attached proof-of-concept uses
> operator%, but I don't feel particularly good about that choice either.
> Ideas?
>

What is the usecase here?
I'm curious on why it isn't covered by BOOST_FOREACH and if that case
really is common enough for a special solution like this.

   / Jonas


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk