Re: [boost] tie alternative?

Subject: Re: [boost] tie alternative?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-28 13:41:30

David Abrahams wrote:

>> for( boost::iterator_range<vertex_iterator> vip( vertices( g ) ) ;
>>      !vip.empty(); vip.advance_begin(1) )
> 
> It's sad, but I'm not as confident in the ability to optimize that form
> because the iterators are bundled into a single struct.  Also I am not
> fond of the constant 1.

Can't be worse than BOOST_FOREACH, which if I recall correctly is much 
less efficient than a normal loop on MSVC.