Re: [boost] [parameter] some extensions to Boost.Parameter

Subject: Re: [boost] [parameter] some extensions to Boost.Parameter
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-29 18:46:13

on Tue Oct 28 2008, "Stjepan Rajko" <stipe-AT-asu.edu> wrote:

>> What kind of difference in compile time are you seeing?
>>
>
> Nothing too dramatic.  In the following experiment:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/178703
>
> ... the results for a simple test scenario gave the following times:
> user: [test_parameter_compilation.o] 0.000195
> system: [test_parameter_compilation.o] 0.000030
> user: [test_parameter_dispatch_compilation.o] 0.000555
> system: [test_parameter_dispatch_compilation.o] 0.000041
>
> test_parameter_compilation corresponds to using ArgumentPacks
> directly, and test_parameter_dispatch_compilation uses
> BOOST_PARAMETER_CONSTRUCTOR (perhaps for BOOST_PARAMETER_FUN the
> difference is even smaller or non-existent)

I presume you actually meant BOOST_PARAMETER_FUNCTION?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com