|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] tie alternative?
From: Robert Jones (robertgbjones_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-30 09:44:15
2008/10/27 David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
> ... The attached proof-of-concept uses
> operator%, but I don't feel particularly good about that choice either.
> Ideas?
>
>
Clearly that proof of concept works, but I would have instinctively assumed
the arguments to operator%() must be const. Even tho' that's obviously
not the case, there's still the question of whether they SHOULD be const.
- Rob.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk