Subject: Re: [boost] [threadpool] new version v12
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-31 19:53:11
> the new version of Boost.Threadpool depends on Boost.Fiber.
Forgive my ignorance but http://tinyurl.com/6r3l6u claims that "fibers
do not provide advantages over a well-designed multithreaded application".
What are the benefits of using them in a threadpool?
-- Michael Marcin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk