Subject: Re: [boost] [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st
From: Frank Mori Hess (fmhess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-01 20:46:30
On Saturday 01 November 2008 16:27, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> As requested earlier by Vincent, I threw together a little benchmark
> program (attached) comparing the speed of boost.signals with signals2.
> It produces the following output on a P4 running Linux:
> boost::signals2::signal, 10 connections, invoking 1000000 times: 0.77 s
> boost::signal, 10 connections, invoking 1000000 times: 0.91 s
Oops, there was an error in the benchmark program, the above two times for
10 untracked connections were reversed. The 0.77s time belongs to
boost::signal, and the 0.91s time is boost::signals2::signal.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk