Subject: Re: [boost] [threadpool] new version v12
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-02 09:02:09
on Fri Oct 31 2008, k-oli-AT-gmx.de wrote:
> the new version of Boost.Threadpool depends on Boost.Fiber.
These two and Boost.Coroutine are all proposed but as-yet-unreviewed
libraries? Can we get the authors of Fiber and Coroutine together to
take the best of each?
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk