Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Is there any need for a math library doing vectors and matrices operations?
From: Marcus Lindblom (macke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-04 04:26:14

Next message: Johan Råde: "Re: [boost] [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] location for PDF docs?"
In reply to: Christophe Riccio: "[boost] Is there any need for a math library doing vectors and matrices operations?"
Next in thread: Gunter Winkler: "Re: [boost] Is there any need for a math library doing vectors and matrices operations?"

Christophe Riccio wrote:
> I'm afraid that such kind of library already have been submitted and
> rejected, I know it need more work but I believe on my approach and I'm not
> afraid to change the library so that everyone agree it's good.

Read the archives to see the challenges people have faced trying to get
everyone (or just a majority) happy.

Cheers,
/Marcus

Next message: Johan Råde: "Re: [boost] [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] location for PDF docs?"
In reply to: Christophe Riccio: "[boost] Is there any need for a math library doing vectors and matrices operations?"
Next in thread: Gunter Winkler: "Re: [boost] Is there any need for a math library doing vectors and matrices operations?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk