Re: [boost] [serialization] rvalues and const-correctness?

Subject: Re: [boost] [serialization] rvalues and const-correctness?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-06 18:49:06

on Thu Nov 06 2008, "Robert Ramey" <ramey-AT-rrsd.com> wrote:

> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>> Robert Ramey skrev:
>>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>> Couldn't we add this overload to the
>>>> archives, or even simply replace the existing operator with this
>>>> one? template<class T>
>>>>    Archive & operator<<(T const & t){
>>>>                        // ^^^^^------------- Note
>>>>        this->This()->save_override(t, 0);
>>>>        return * this->This();
>>>>    }
>>>
>>> Aaaa - I would have to spend some time to look into that.
>>
>> Isn't this the debate we have had so many times?
>
> well, we havn't had it lately.
>
> But this is actually a little different since this is calling a member
> function inside serialization.  Since save(...) is a const member
> funtion, the f() would have to be const.  if you can't make f() const,
> you've got something to look into.

The member function wasn't my point at all.  I just want to be able to
save rvalues.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com