Re: [boost] boost and vendor's TR1 implementations

Subject: Re: [boost] boost and vendor's TR1 implementations
From: Sergey Sadovnikov (flex_ferrum_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-11 15:24:08

Hello, Michael.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 11:09:03 PM you wrote:

MM> Sergey Sadovnikov wrote:
>> Do you mean what there is no way to make boost and TR1 implementations
>> don't conflict each other? And, for example, boost::shared_ptr
>> couldn't be transparently replaced by corresponding TR1
>> class?
>> 
MM> Correct, TR1 shared_ptr doesn't support boost::make_shared for instance.

Hm. How I can see, boost::make_shared doesn't demand from shared_ptr
class something special which not covered by TR1 specification. So I
can replace explicit implementation of boost::shared_ptr with 'using
std::tr1::shared_ptr' directive. Am I right?

-- 
Best Regards,
 Sergey                          mailto:flex_ferrum_at_[hidden]