Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st

Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-12 05:41:09

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fabio Fracassi" <f.fracassi_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost-users_at_[hidden]>
Cc: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 
library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st

> I have a tendency to yes, because even now it is better than what we have 
> now (which is not saying that signals1 was bad!), on the other hand I 
> think that the missing documentation is crucial.

I think that a mini review would ensure that the documentation is updated as 
we expect.

Vicente