Subject: Re: [boost] boost and vendor's TR1 implementations
From: Sergey Sadovnikov (flex_ferrum_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-13 03:16:44
Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 5:33:36 AM you wrote:
DA> No, it's simpler than that. transform_iterator requires
DA> AdaptableUnaryFunction and the result of tr1::bind is not one of those.
But result of boost::bind *is* one of those?
-- Best Regards, Sergey mailto:flex_ferrum_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk