Subject: Re: [boost] [Random] design of the random library
From: Ares Lagae (ares.lagae_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-15 02:07:19
Thank you for your reply.
I have checked N2606 and I noticed that the random library was changed
heavily for C++0X. I did not know that. Most of the issues have been
solved. C++0X supersedes TR1, but several of the issues still apply to
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk