Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] BOOST_FOREACH slow?
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-17 16:10:51

David Abrahams wrote:
> on Mon Nov 17 2008, Eric Niebler <> wrote:
>> During FOEACH's review, extensive performance tests showed FOREACH was
>> only about 5% slower than the hand-coded equivalent on average.
> Just curious: you didn't compare with std::for_each (e.g. to see the
> effects of loop unrolling), did you?

I didn't do the benchmark myself, and I don't remember if std::for_each
was part of it, sorry.

Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at