Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] namespace noncopyable_
From: Kenneth Laskoski (kennethlaskoski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-18 23:16:26

Why is this nested namespace noncopyable_ necessary? The comment "//
protection from unintended ADL" seems greek to me. Can someone please
enlighten me and point out a practical consequence of simply defining
"namespace boost { class noncopyable {...}; }"


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at