Re: [boost] [config] typo on doc

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] typo on doc
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-20 12:45:50

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [config] typo on doc

> 
> vicente.botet wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> there are some typos in the table "
>>> Macros that describe C++0x features not supported
>>> "
>>> 
>>> BOOST_NO_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS
>>> The compiler does not support defaulted (= default) functions.
>>> [[BOOST_NO_DELETED_FUNCTIONS The compiler does not support deleted
>>> (= delete) functions. 
>>> 
>>> BOOST_NO_UNICODE_LITERALS
>>> The compiler does not support Unicode (u8, u, U#) literals. ]]
>>> [[BOOST_NO_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES` The compiler does not support
>>> variadic templates. 
> 
> Now fixed in Trunk.

By the way the config files do not defines these macros at all it defines instead some macros like 
#    define BOOST_HAS_STATIC_ASSERT
#    define BOOST_HAS_VARIADIC_TMPL
#    define BOOST_HAS_RVALUE_REFS
#    define BOOST_HAS_DECLTYPE

What is wrong?
 
>>> Can some macros be added to emulate the compiler behavior when
>>> 
>>> BOOST_NO_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS
>>> 
>>>    BOOST_CONSTRUCTOR_DEFAULT
>>>    BOOST_COPYCONSTRUCTOR_DEFAULT
>>> BOOST_NO_DELETED_FUNCTIONS
>>>    BOOST_CONSTRUCTOR_DELETE
>>>    BOOST_COPYCONSTRUCTOR_DELETE
> 
> Sorry, don't follow what you mean there,

See my today post "N2346 - Defaulted and Deleted Functions emulation"

Vicente