Subject: Re: [boost] Breaking existing libraries
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-20 14:32:41
on Thu Nov 20 2008, Tomas Puverle <Tomas.Puverle-AT-morganstanley.com> wrote:
> You may or may not have noticed a thread I started on boost.users about the
> breaking changes to Boost.Range. Hereâs a short summary: We are currently
> (firmwide) using boost 1.33.1. I am in the process of trying to migrate and
> test some of our apps with boost 1.37. In 1.35 there was a breaking change to
> Boost.Range with respect to how singular ranges behave. This brings up several
> 1) The breakage was silent. The interface stayed the same but the behavior
> changed, and drastically so.
> 2) No communation: While I donât usually post to boost.devel/boost.user, I and
> my colleagues still read it. Nobody recalls any mention of this on the list.
> Searching gmane brings up nothing, either.
> 3) No documentation on the boost website. As far as I can see, this change was
> introduced in 1.35 this March.
> On http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1_35_0, there is no mention of a
> breaking change to Boost.Range.
> 4) The new Boost.Range behaves differently in debug and release builds. The
> public function is_singular() always returns false in release builds even when
> it would return true in debug builds.
> Apart from the fact that this change breaks a lot of our code and
> obsoletes several useful (necessary?) idioms, the manner in which it
> happened is far below the standards that one has come to expect from
> At the moment, I have to say I donât have a good answer to how to fix
> our code. However, I would at least like to try to make sure this
> kind of silent breakage doesnât happen again.
Yes, this is an unfortunate situation. If you indeed want to try to
make sure this kind of silent breakage doesnât happen again, there's
something you can do about it: write a page of library maintenance
guidelines on the wiki at http://svn.boost.org. We are sorely missing a
policy on this, and when less-experienced library authors come along,
they often don't hew to the same standards that many of us take for
granted. If you don't have write permission for the wiki, please let us
know and we'll send you an invitation.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk