Re: [boost] Breaking existing libraries

Subject: Re: [boost] Breaking existing libraries
From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-21 09:58:23

Markus Werle wrote:
>
> [Sidenote: I'd prefer boost::spirit to stay as it is and spirit2c be renamed to 
> boost::ultimate_parser, since it is a *completely* *different* library.]
>   

I think the same has to be said for boost as a whole. As there is no 
guarantee to make two subsequent boost versions compatible with each 
other, I think it is only fair to consider them two distinct products. 
As unfortunate as that is for us users, it's the reality we have to face.

Regards,
       Stefan

-- 
      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...