Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Breaking existing libraries
From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-21 09:58:23

Markus Werle wrote:
> [Sidenote: I'd prefer boost::spirit to stay as it is and spirit2c be renamed to
> boost::ultimate_parser, since it is a *completely* *different* library.]

I think the same has to be said for boost as a whole. As there is no
guarantee to make two subsequent boost versions compatible with each
other, I think it is only fair to consider them two distinct products.
As unfortunate as that is for us users, it's the reality we have to face.


      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at