Subject: Re: [boost] Breaking existing libraries
From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-21 09:58:23
Markus Werle wrote:
> [Sidenote: I'd prefer boost::spirit to stay as it is and spirit2c be renamed to
> boost::ultimate_parser, since it is a *completely* *different* library.]
I think the same has to be said for boost as a whole. As there is no
guarantee to make two subsequent boost versions compatible with each
other, I think it is only fair to consider them two distinct products.
As unfortunate as that is for us users, it's the reality we have to face.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk