Re: [boost] tweaking the review process (was: signals2 review results)

Subject: Re: [boost] tweaking the review process (was: signals2 review results)
From: John Phillips (phillips_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-21 13:22:00

Stjepan Rajko wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:52 AM, John Phillips
> <phillips_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Stjepan Rajko wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>  Do you think it would help if the Wizards stressed this need and requested
>> an affirmation of it as part of the lead in to the review?
>>
> 
> Definitely.  I'm not sure whether stressing this requirement would
> turn off potential review managers because of the added effort, but I
> think it would make the overall review process better.
> 
> Stjepan

   I don't want to discourage anyone who will do a good job of managing 
a review, but if we decide this is a necessary step in providing a good 
review then I'm not upset by discouraging anyone who won't do it.

                        John