Subject: Re: [boost] [threadpool] new version - supporting future library(C++0x) from Anthony Williams
Date: 2008-11-23 09:43:55
Am Sonntag, 23. November 2008 15:09:13 schrieb vicente.botet:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <k-oli_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 8:40 PM
> Subject: [boost] [threadpool] new version - supporting future
> library(C++0x) from Anthony Williams
> > Hello,
> > I've uploaded a new version of boost.threadpool (v17) at
> > http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=boos
> > It uses the future implementation of Anthony Williams (C++0x - available
> > at http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk/files/n2561 future.hpp). Please
> > save it as file 'future'.
> is there any reason you use the 'just' implementation instead of the boost
? Don't know what you want to say ?
> Not every body use Visual C++.
> At the end we are in Boost, isn't it?
I don't use Visual C++ - I'm developing on UNIX. Still don't know what you
want to say.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk