Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?

Subject: Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-23 11:12:53

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Handley" <dave_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> on Sat Nov 22 2008, "Dave Handley" <dave-AT-dah.me.uk> wrote:
>>> This is something that is gradually being fixed, but hearing the
>>> complaints from Java programmers moving to using C++ and Boost, it's
>>> very hard to argue against them.  Given the quality of the docs, are
>>> you surprised when people figure things out from the source?
>>
>> I guess you're assuming I'll agree that the docs are lacking.
> 
> You don't necessarily need to agree.  If the docs in any library are 
> lacking, people will go to the source to figure out how to use it.

Why they do not just make a specific request on the Boost trac system?

Vicente