Subject: Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-23 14:39:30
David Abrahams skrev:
> on Sun Nov 23 2008, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen-AT-dezide.com> wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, the Range concept checks appear to have been changed
>>> about a year ago, apparently in response to the changes in
>>> iterator_range. As far as I can tell from looking at the svn history,
>>> when iterator_range failed to meet the Range concepts, rather than
>>> changing iterator_range,
>> Is an iterator_range not a range? I don't recall anything like this. Was I the one
>> that changed the test?
> You have the tools to answer those questions yourself. It's all there
> in Trac and SVN.
I remember the thing vaguely now. There was **a lot** of discussion
about how to specify the concepts, and how to map a custom type to the
concept. I think Eric initiated that process way back. I'm quite ok with
the end result. It took a seriously long time to get there.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk