|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Breaking existing libraries
From: Tomas Puverle (Tomas.Puverle_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-24 22:11:55
> If the compromise does not include going back to the old behavior for
> boost::iterator_range, then I'm open to suggestions
(Joke intended)
This really doesn't seem to meet the criteria for a "compromise".
Just sounds like you're getting your way.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk