Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?

Subject: Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-25 13:31:55

on Mon Nov 24 2008, "Tomas Puverle" <Tomas.Puverle-AT-morganstanley.com> wrote:

>> There's no reason that they both have to be in boost. Boost range
>> should let you use your own range class.
>
> And you're absolutely right.  Having said that, it's not inconceivable that 
> others may have been relying on the same behavour.
> That's one of the things this discussion was about. 

Yes.  The library maintainer ought to do something to help those people,
by providing the old behavior in code somewhere (even if that code only
appears in docs).

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com