Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?

Subject: Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-25 16:50:47

David Abrahams skrev:
> on Mon Nov 24 2008, "Tomas Puverle" <Tomas.Puverle-AT-morganstanley.com> wrote:

> If you really like the abstraction, there's no reason you can't use
> toms::iterator_range instead of the one in Boost.  That would surely
> induce far less churn and instability in your codebase.
> 
>> Perhaps it's better that we go forward and invest the effort in
>>
>> 1)  Making sure that some of the Range concepts get fixed

What is broken?

-Thorsten