Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] default constructors
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-01 12:31:45
on Sun Nov 30 2008, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard-AT-ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> Ideally, we would want destructive move semantics (move semantics
> where the moved-from object is destructed when move is performed) but
> those are not what C++0x provides, unfortunately.
I don't think it's unfortunate. Destructive move semantics is nearly
impossible to use correctly in many conditions.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk