Re: [boost] [review][constrained_value] Review of Constrained Value Library begins today

Subject: Re: [boost] [review][constrained_value] Review of Constrained Value Library begins today
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-01 12:57:27

Zach Laine wrote:
> Quite true.  But the code above is user-supplied, so the user can
> write their code so that such collisions do not occur, if they need
> identical behavior to int in NDEBUG mode, or the library author could
> change the spelling of value() to be something less likely to cause
> problems, or both.
>   
Yeah, that would be possible. But you know? I think I'll stick with 
unconstrained. :-)

Sebastian