Re: [boost] [Serialization] this seems wrong

Subject: Re: [boost] [Serialization] this seems wrong
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-02 14:32:37

Michael Marcin wrote:
> Michael Marcin wrote:
>> I don't know about getting rid of the unnamed namespace but 
>> essentially we just need a unique name per type in a translation 
>> unit.. so how about:
>>
>> #define BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_GUID(T, K)                                \
>> namespace                                                            \
>> {                                                                    \
>>     template< typename U >                                           \
>>     class init_guid                                                  \
>>     {                                                                \
>>         static ::boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<U> const & \
>>         guid_initializer_;                                           \
>>     };                                                               \
>>     template<> ::boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<T> const & \
>>         init_guid<T>::guid_initializer_ =                            \
>>             ::boost::serialization::singleton<                       \
>>                 ::boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<T>        \
>>             >::get_mutable_instance().export_guid(K);                \
>> }
>>
> 
> Do we still need to explicitly instantiate init_guid here? If so add
> 
> template class init_guid<T>;
> 

Never mind this fails if we have 2 export macros.. silly me.

-- 
Michael Marcin