Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [boost.build] should we not define _SECURE_SCL=0 by default for all msvc toolsets
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-04 10:52:33
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>>> I think it would be ok to allow both options, but probably the
>>> default should equal the Microsoft default with an easy way to
>>> opt-out of the madness!
Agree 100%, our default should equal the compiler default, otherwise it'll
catch too many folks out.
>> But AFAIK, even the prebuilt binaries that you get from Boost
>> Consulting are built with _SECURE_SCL=0.
Really ??? I hadn't realised that, that's not good IMO, given that the
define changes the ABI away from the compilers default.
One thing I hope we can all agree on: this should be a toolset feature, and
it should change the library-name-mangling so that auto_link.hpp can select
the correct binary (it doesn't at present, but just let me know what the
correct name-mangling is and I'll fix that).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk