Re: [boost] [review][constrained_value] Review of Constrained ValueLibrary begins today

Subject: Re: [boost] [review][constrained_value] Review of Constrained ValueLibrary begins today
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-06 18:50:39

I wrote:
> Also it might be worthwhile to point out that shared runtime mutable  
> constraints with no overhead per constrained object are possible,  
> using static members.  (Or maybe that's too weird.)  I might  
> implement epsilon this way, as my impression is that  
> numeric_limits<>::epsilon() is not useful for this purpose.

Of course I won't use this technique but something more like what's  
described in "Compile-time fixed bounds" - don't know what I was  
thinking.  Runtime modification of epsilon is just silly.