Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] UUID library (mini-)review starts today, November 23rd
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-06 19:30:16
> > > ... And, what should the default constructor do? Create a null
> > > or a unique one?
> > It feels like you are struggling to associate the default constructor
> > with something. :-) You know, you really do not have to. The default
> > constructor has quite a clear meaning. If a class has no
> > matching that meaning, that class should not be defining the default
> > constructor and should not be hijacking that constructor for anything
> > else. Convenient? Sure. Good API? Hmm, I am not sure -- a good
> > interface should be saying what it means.
> I also wonder about this usefulness of the default constructor for
> boost::uuids::uuid. Maybe it should just be left out.
Keep in mind you can't put a uuid into a std container if it isn't default
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk