Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-announce] [review][constrained_value] Review ofConstrained Value Library begins today
From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-10 02:42:08

Next message: Agustín K-ballo Bergé: "[boost] Compile-time autoincrementable values"
Previous message: Daryle Walker: "Re: [boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?"
In reply to: Robert Kawulak: "Re: [boost] [Boost-announce] [review][constrained_value] Review ofConstrained Value Library begins today"

On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:48 PM, Robert Kawulak wrote:

>> From: Daryle Walker
>
>> On the usage guide, I don't think the tutorial's "ignore" type does
>> what you think it does.
>
> Could you please elaborate on this?
[TRUNCATE]

The "ignore" type's member function template seems to throw an
exception upon detecting a violation, i.e. the default behavior. But
isn't the point of this type to do nothing on violations? (Too much
copy & paste?)

-- 
Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT hotmail DOT com

Next message: Agustín K-ballo Bergé: "[boost] Compile-time autoincrementable values"
Previous message: Daryle Walker: "Re: [boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?"
In reply to: Robert Kawulak: "Re: [boost] [Boost-announce] [review][constrained_value] Review ofConstrained Value Library begins today"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk