Subject: Re: [boost] [proto][design] why unary_expr, binary_expr; but no nullary_expr?
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-14 02:58:12
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Larry Evans wrote:
>> Although there's unary_expr<Tag,*>, binary_expr<tag,*,*>
>> in traits.hpp there's no nullary_expr<Tag>. I realize
>> this would be a replacement to the current terminal template
>> but with a user specified tag. After all,
>> if a user specified tag for n-ary (where n>0) expressions
>> *is* desirable, why is a user specified tag for 0-ary
>> expressions *not* desirable?
> Mostly because I couldn't think of a use case at the time. There's
> nothing in Proto's design that would prohibit a 0-ary expression from
> having a tag type other than tag::terminal, but I bet there are some
> places in the code that make that assumption. They would all need to be
> hunted down and fixed. Probably not too hard.
This is now implemented on trunk.
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk