Re: [boost] [library submission] smoothsort

Subject: Re: [boost] [library submission] smoothsort
From: Allan Wind (allan_wind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-16 13:29:34

On 2008-12-16T19:11:01, Edouard A. wrote:
> Maybe we should sort what's in the queue and group that into sub-libraries,
> such as:
> 
> Boost.Algorithm.Search
> Boost.Algorithm.Sort
> Boost.Algorithm.Split (?)
> ...
> 
> 
> Not doing this right now may quickly result in a vast catalogue of
> heterogeneous routines, transforming Boost.Algorithm into
> Boost.HereBeDragons.

Tagging is a more flexible way of organizing information than an 
ontology.  Searching becomes the preferred way to find information as 
the domain grows.  To me it is also desirable to able to cherry pick the 
pieces instead of being forced to adopt the whole boost library.

/Allan
-- 
Allan Wind
Life Integrity, LLC
http://lifeintegrity.com