Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] tweaking the review process
From: Fabio Fracassi (f.fracassi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-19 06:42:50
David Abrahams schrieb:
> on Wed Dec 17 2008, Fabio Fracassi <f.fracassi-AT-gmx.net> wrote:
>> David Abrahams schrieb:
>>> on Mon Dec 15 2008, John Phillips <phillips-AT-mps.ohio-state.edu> wrote:
>>>> I don't know if I was the first to do this, but I have done it. Looking at the
>>>> current contents of the instructions to review managers, either they have changed
>>>> since I started managing reviews or I somehow hallucinated extra words to add the
>>>> list to the lists that should receive an announcement of the review.
>>> An announcement is one thing; instructing people to post their reviews
>>> in the same list is a different thing entirely.
>> You don't have to, it happens almost automatically if you are not
>> careful. Many people write their Review as a reply to the original
>> announcement, and if you are not extra careful to remove the user list
>> from the recipients your review gets send to both lists.
> The poster of the announcement should make it clear how to post a
> review. I never liked the idea of reviews showing up in the list with
> the subject "Review period for Boost.XXXX begins today" anyway. Also
> s/he can set the Reply-To: field.
When using thunderbird as a client to the gmane news gateway the Reply
to fields don't seem to work though.
I don't know if there is a technical solution to this particular problem.
Beside this I agree with you, if the original anouncement clearly states
that reviews and followups should go to .devel.
Still I think that sometimes some messages might go astray and maybe we
should suggest that the review manager and/or the submitter should have
an eye on the users list, so that nothing is lost. (and maybe forward
those strays to .devel)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk