[boost] [unique_ptr] So how is it used differently?

Subject: [boost] [unique_ptr] So how is it used differently?
From: Sid Sacek (heavyreign_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-21 16:30:55

Thank you, I didn't realize it was already a part of the latest boost
library.

 

What I'm curious about is two things...

 

1)    When would I choose unique_ptr<> over auto_ptr<> ?

 

And

 

2)    When would I choose unique_ptr<> over scoped_ptr<> ?

 

Can somebody please provide some coding differences? If these coding
examples are already documented someplace, can you please direct me to them?

 

Thank you very much in advance.

-Sid Sacek

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
On Behalf Of OvermindDL1
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 6:01 AM
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [boost] unique_ptr, was: Composing non copyable and movable
classes

 

On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Sid Sacek <heavyreign_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> 

> I tried to locate the mentioned unique_ptr<> classes for testing, but am

> unable to locate them.

> 

> Can somebody point me in the right direction please?

 

This is the only unique_ptr I know of:

http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_35_0/doc/html/interprocess/interprocess_smar
t_ptr.html#interprocess.interprocess_smart_ptr.unique_ptr

_______________________________________________

Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost