Re: [boost] [boost.build] should we not define _SECURE_SCL=0 by default for all msvc toolsets

Subject: Re: [boost] [boost.build] should we not define _SECURE_SCL=0 by default for all msvc toolsets
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-22 15:04:10

Anteru wrote:
> OvermindDL1 schrieb:
>> Do you have a link to send me to for that?  I buy VS by itself, I do
>> not have an MSDN subscription (I do not even make that much spare
>> money a year), as such I do not often stay with the 'in' Microsoft
>> community, end up figuring most out by myself.  I actually compile
>> more for *nix, but all by coding takes place in Visual C++ and Visual
>> Assist until there is a 'nix IDE that is mostly-comparable.  Just this
>> issue was odd in that GCC *vastly* outperformed VS, when usually VS is
>> usually a 'little' bit faster then GCC in compiled code, had to look
>> in to it.
> 
> I guess stl_at_[hidden] should do the job. That should be their STL
> developer (Stephan T. Lavavej).
> 

Microsoft's STL developer's initials are S.T.L.? That's amazing.

-- 
Michael Marcin