Re: [boost] [unique_ptr] So how is it used differently?

Subject: Re: [boost] [unique_ptr] So how is it used differently?
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-22 21:10:39

Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> Sid Sacek wrote:
> 
>> 1)    When would I choose unique_ptr<> over auto_ptr<> ?
> 
> Always.
> auto_ptr is deprecated and is dangerous.
> 
> unique_ptr, for example, perfectly works with containers.
> 

With containers written to support unique_ptr or with any Container as 
defined by the standard's concept?

-- 
Michael Marcin