Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [review][constrained_value] Review of Constrained Value Library begins today
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-23 17:19:15
Thomas Klimpel wrote:
> Mika Heiskanen wrote:
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> I suggest reading through my posts in
>>> which give the arguments in detail.
>> Thank you for the link, I read the thread from start to finish.
>> It was not clear to me at the end that any agreement was
>> actually reached, in particular with respect to terminology.
> I also read the thread from start to finish. About halfway through the thread, I suddenly could follow the arguments given by David Abrahams, and he seems to be right. But now std::logic_error suddenly seems to make no sense any longer. Is this a valid conclusion from reading that thread?
Yes. Many people (me included) find logic_error to be a mistake.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk