Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [review][constrained_value] Review of Constrained Value Library begins today

Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [review][constrained_value] Review of Constrained Value Library begins today
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-23 17:19:15

Thomas Klimpel wrote:
> Mika Heiskanen wrote:
>   
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>     
>>> I suggest reading through my posts in
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++.moderated/browse_frm/thread/80083ac31a1188da 
>>> which give the arguments in detail.
>>>       
>> Thank you for the link, I read the thread from start to finish.
>> It was not clear to me at the end that any agreement was
>> actually reached, in particular with respect to terminology.
>>     
>
> I also read the thread from start to finish. About halfway through the thread, I suddenly could follow the arguments given by David Abrahams, and he seems to be right. But now std::logic_error suddenly seems to make no sense any longer. Is this a valid conclusion from reading that thread?
>   

Yes. Many people (me included) find logic_error to be a mistake.

Sebastian