Re: [boost] [UUID] PODness Revisited

Subject: Re: [boost] [UUID] PODness Revisited
From: Vladimir Batov (batov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-26 06:00:24

In fact, all that POD/non-POD "fight" seems to be a storm in a cup. The 
Standard (draft dated 2008-10-04) revised and refined definitions of POD. 
Now POD is a "trivial class/type" (section 9). I feel though that all the 
perks Adam and Scott have been mentioning are not restricted to the trivial 
types (PODs) but extend on to "trivially copyable types" as well which 
Andy's uuid seems to be the perfect example of.

Best,
V.