Subject: Re: [boost] [logging] Interest check on logging library.
From: Jamie Allsop (ja11sop_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-31 21:43:22
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> Jason Wagner wrote:
> Sorry, couldn't resist. I think, my library fits these requirements
> quite well. Why would you start your own implementation from scratch? Is
> there something that doesn't suit you in my implementation?
If I recall your library requires a lib to be linked in. That's a deal
breaker for me. This library seems to move away from that. What I really
need is captured in my review of John Torjo's second library
I'd be interested if either library can support this minimal use case.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk