Re: [boost] [logging] Interest check on logging library.

Subject: Re: [boost] [logging] Interest check on logging library.
From: Jamie Allsop (ja11sop_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-31 21:43:22

Andrey Semashev wrote:
> Jason Wagner wrote:
[...]
> 
> Sorry, couldn't resist. I think, my library fits these requirements 
> quite well. Why would you start your own implementation from scratch? Is 
> there something that doesn't suit you in my implementation?

If I recall your library requires a lib to be linked in. That's a deal 
breaker for me. This library seems to move away from that. What I really 
need is captured in my review of John Torjo's second library
<http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/02/133462.php>

I'd be interested if either library can support this minimal use case.

Jamie