Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 unique_ptr emulation
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-03 10:51:31
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> Although I've been running tests, I don't really yet have a neatly
> packaged test suite. Part of the problem is that many of the tests
> are "must fail" and I don't know of a portable/automated way to handle
> that kind of test. Has boost addressed "must fail" tests?
Isn't that what compile-fail Jam instructions are for? Just remember to
put each test case in its own file, or failures will be masked.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk