Subject: Re: [boost] [iterator] counting_iterator::referenceshouldbevalue_type?
From: Arno SchÃ¶dl (aschoedl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-06 13:11:15
>> It seems to me that the standard should specify whether iterator::reference must
>> outlive its iterator.
> That's a separate issue. It doesn't.
I am confused. As far as I understand, Bo Persson just posted that this has been clarified:
So reference/pointer do not outlive their iterator, and in our case, boost::counting_iterator is correct and boost::reverse_iterator is wrong.
Or what am I missing?
-- Dr. Arno Schoedl Â· aschoedl_at_[hidden] Technical Director think-cell Software GmbH Â· Invalidenstr. 34 Â· 10115 Berlin, Germany http://www.think-cell.com Â· phone +49-30-666473-10 Â· toll-free (US) +1-800-891-8091 Directors: Dr. Markus Hannebauer, Dr. Arno Schoedl Â· Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 85229
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk