Subject: Re: [boost] [Range] make range_const/mutable_iterator<C>::type non-existent if C is non-range
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-10 05:49:54
Arno SchÃ¶dl skrev:
>>> is it o.k. if I add these Boost.Range changes to my "partition_point" library, so it will be reviewed and adopted as a package? I'd put lazy_typedef into boost::detail::range.
>> I don't see why not. As for the portability, I guess we can test that on
>> trunk. I'll see if I can get some time to do this...
> partition_point library will test this for its use cases, which covers the relevant ones:
> - use as return value,
> - use as parameter,
> - overload disambiguation on it.
Ok, so if it works as portable as Boost.Range, then we can add it to
trunk and then it will be part of 1.39.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk